IPACS Aerofly Forum
Recent Activities
-
Eddie76
June 16, 2024 at 12:09 PM Posted the thread Nav Aid frequencies vanished.ThreadI am running on iPhone 15 pro max and have noticed this morning that all navaid frequencies have Vanished and are reading as ‘0’. Has anyone else experienced this? -
xiagua
June 16, 2024 at 11:52 AM Reacted with to Jet-Pack (IPACS)’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
That's the difference between a teaser with pretty final images compared to very early teasers.
This isn't a thing that will be completed in a few weeks, new aircraft usually take months to complete because of the insane level of detail we put in. -
Armitage
June 16, 2024 at 10:45 AM Reacted with to the image CH - Meeting at the BÜRGENSTOCK summit 😆.Reaction (Image) -
Samyflumsi
June 16, 2024 at 9:07 AM Reacted with to the image Swiss Museum of Transport, Luzern.Reaction (Image) -
Samyflumsi
June 16, 2024 at 9:05 AM Reacted with to the image Über die Alpen!!!!!!.Reaction (Image) -
SkyX
June 16, 2024 at 8:19 AM Reacted with to Aerofly addiction’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post) -
MerkyAviation11
June 16, 2024 at 8:04 AM Replied to the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Post[…]
My fear is that if -900 is made first and then later users want the -1000. It would be disregarded just like with Infinite Flight. I mean we have never had -1000 on any sim (I know RFS has theirs but I could care less about them). The better solution… -
Jet-Pack (IPACS)
June 16, 2024 at 7:07 AM Reacted with to Quichenic’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
No not necessarily the a320 has been in the sim since aerofly fs 1 mobile probably before they started following the system of larger variant first then shorter variant -
Flyish
June 16, 2024 at 6:36 AM Reacted with to Danielmcg40’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
But the problem is that we never get the shorter variants, the 787-10 is already 2.5 years old and the 777-300ER 4.5 years old. At this point, woudn't it be easier just adding the most popular one instead of the larger one, and that's it? -
Thekingbuji333
June 16, 2024 at 5:44 AM Reacted with to Danielmcg40’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
I know that, I was just using the A321 as an example of why the "larger variant first then shorter variant" rule doesn't really make sense. If they were really following this logic, we would have had an A319 instead of an A321