IPACS Aerofly Forum
Recent Activities
-
j.h.aviation
June 22, 2024 at 10:58 AM Posted the thread 737 landing gear position.ThreadCan't i put the landing gear position at OFF on the 737NG? -
j.h.aviation
June 22, 2024 at 9:52 AM Uploaded the image KLAX 24R approach.Image -
ApfelFlieger
June 22, 2024 at 9:31 AM Replied to the thread Addon scenery.Post[…]
IPACS recommends not using hyphens "-" in file and folder names. Therefore, the aircraft folder should be named "/hb_cit" instead of "/hb-cit".
And now it depends on whether "hb_cit" is just a livery variant or an independent aircraft:- For a standalone
-
Samyflumsi
June 22, 2024 at 8:58 AM Reacted with to the image LSGG - New parking position with Pushback.Reaction (Image) -
gordon852888
June 22, 2024 at 8:19 AM Reacted with to Jet-Pack (IPACS)’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post) -
Thekingbuji333
June 22, 2024 at 7:30 AM Reacted with to FlyingJohn’s post in the thread Aerofly FS2023 Bug.Reaction (Post)[…]
Yeh i reinstalled the game and i did download the additional scenery thing -
Thekingbuji333
June 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Reacted with to Flyish’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)Just being clear, I am very excited for the A350, no matter the variant that’s chosen.
But regarding the -900 vs -1000 debate, just consider the “benefit” we *could* receive for each variant. Obviously the -900 has more liveries and is more popular,… -
Thekingbuji333
June 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Reacted with to Quichenic’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
Because they have other things that are more important on their list if they add larger variant first they can later make the larger variant shorter and make the shorter versions of the planes I'd rather them adding new planes instead of adding for… -
Thekingbuji333
June 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Reacted with to Danielmcg40’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
The excuse of adding the larger variant first is literally because it would be easier to make the other variants just by shrinking the existing larger one
Then why we still don't have any smaller variant? -
Thekingbuji333
June 22, 2024 at 7:29 AM Reacted with to Danielmcg40’s post in the thread Development Teaser: New Aircraft?.Reaction (Post)[…]
More liveries = more variety for flights
An A350-900 instead of a -1000 is still going to be realistic and high-quality