Wait, more announcements? Is my birthday and Christmas together right now?😂
(Hope for a333 xd)
Didn't a user already announce that they were working on an A330?
Posts by Jet-Pack (IPACS)
-
-
The aircraft with a detailed modeled interior have views inside the cabin. Any aircraft that doesn't have views on the inside also has no cabin model that looks any good when you get closer to it.
-
Will the N1/N2 EPR balance vary with altitude? core on take off/ fan in the cruise?
Well it should vary, yes. I haven't programmed anything specifically for this, the EPR is just the result of the pressure before and after the engine, so the rest is native simulation in Aerofly...
-
We already have a moving map in the desktop version but it's not yet available in mobile due to the limited screen space and the menu rework this would require. Instead you can still easily see your current position in the location menu.
-
More airplanes.... Instead of weather or fuel.
I can't hide that I am a bit disappointed. That's certainly not what most people want next. But ok.
We're constantly working on new features but it would be not be wise to wait until each and every feature is finished and never do something in between. It doesn't seem to matter what we do, there always will be someone who things we should have done something differently.
-
It can be understood as: it is not simply lengthening a product, it is a completely remade model, right？
The A321 is a stretch of our existing A320 model but some re-texturing has been done as well. There are numerous changes in the model compared to the A320 but the model is based on the A320 model. Building a new model would be a crazy waste of time
Will the A321's CFM and IAE engines have different sound effects?
The IAE engines are getting new sounds, yes.
With the A321 with IAE engines coming soon to Aerofly, would there be a chance of the Neo variant coming to Aerofly as well?
Perhaps down the road, yes. For now it's only the normal A321 but at least in two versions with CFM and IAE.
-
Is the Saba airport what this refers to?
That's one of the things. Also an A321. And more announcements coming over the weekend
-
A new Airbus is coming soon and we have more blog posts planned over the weekend, so stay tuned!
A rapid-fire of blogs incoming
-
There are a lot of liveries planned for the A321, I don't know which ones from the top of my head though.
-
Jet-Pack (IPACS) is that Saba airport that you were talking about few days ago something new coming 🤔
The Saba airports is coming soon.
-
Yes, this can happen because the software assumes it's a new computer. Please activate your product with the product key again.
-
Jet-Pack (IPACS) Can you see which plane the community uses the most?
Such a statistic would be heavily biased towards planes that are already in the base product and aren't an in app purchase.
-
We have a King Air C90 GTx and not a King Air 350...
-
Unfortunately... It seems that's exactly what they have been working on. I just found out.
See blog here:
South East Asia Airports updated
We've added new custom made terminals, 3D objects and details to many airports in South East Asia.- MWKK - Kuala Lumpur
- VTBS - Bangkok Suvarnabhumi
- VTSP - Phuket
- WIII - Soekarno–Hatta (Jakarta, Indonesia)
- WBSB - Brunei
- VVTS - Tan Son Nhat (Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam)
- VVNB - Noi Bai (Hanoi, Vietnam)
- WIMM - Kualanamu (Medan, Indonesia)
- WAHH - Adisutjipto (Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
- WSSL - Seletar (Singapore)
- WADD - Ngurah Rai (Bali, Indonesia)
- WARR - Juanda (Sidoarjo, Indonesia)
That's not what I was talking about though, that's already "old" news
-
The engines probably need some rework. They were the first turbo engines we ever added to the sim and by now we do have a bit more experience on how we can tune them to get more performance out.
Since the engines are based on a physical simulation of the thermodynamic processes in a turbo engine it's not as easy as increasing a single number.
Edit: We have a King Air C90, not a King Air 350.
-
Bonjour,
Mon expérience avec Aerofly FS Global est mitigée. Les graphismes sont époustouflants en altitude, mais dans de nombreux endroits, ils sont flous et les visuels au sol sont décevants ; les aéroports 3D pourraient avoir des textures plus réalistes. Il y a un manque important d'aires de stationnement comme dans Real Flight Simulator, et la météo en temps réel serait appréciée, car il n'y a actuellement pas de pluie, alors que c'est une fonctionnalité standard dans tous les simulateurs de vol actuels sur iOS. De nombreux aéroports 3D clés sont manquants, tels que TNCM, TFFJ, NTAA, FMEE, TFFR, malgré un abonnement payant par satellite. La modélisation des avions est un point fort avec la capacité d'interagir avec la plupart des boutons. Même s'ils ne sont pas complets à 100 %, peut-être seront-ils dans de futures mises à jour ? Cependant, des caractéristiques essentielles telles que le contrôle de la circulation aérienne, l'ambiance ATC dans le FMC/MCDU, ou même l'équipage de bord avec des annonces sont manquantes. Les services au sol tels que les jetsways, l'équipe au sol, le ravitaillement et le pushback automatique sont également absents. De plus, des avions modernes comme l'A350, l'A330neo, l'A320/21Neo, l'A220 et l'ATR42/72 600, avec des livrées de compagnies aériennes modernes et des mises à jour ou des variantes de fret, sont manquants, ainsi que des vues de cabine ou des vues de fenêtre comme dans RFS ou FS2020.
Je me demande si les futures mises à jour répondront à ces préoccupations, ou si nous devrons attendre la prochaine évolution d'Aerofly sur iOS l'année prochaine. Le jeu a du potentiel, mais ces mises à jour arriveront-elles bientôt, même si elles sont payées ?
Good morning, My experience with Aerofly FS Global is mixed. The graphics are stunning at altitude, but in many places they are blurry and the ground visuals are disappointing; 3D airports could have more realistic textures. There is a significant lack of parking areas like in Real Flight Simulator, and real-time weather would be appreciated, as there is currently no rain, while this is a standard feature in all flight simulators. current flights on iOS. Many key 3D airports are missing, such as TNCM, TFFJ, NTAA, FMEE, TFFR, despite having a paid satellite subscription. Airplane modeling is a strong point with the ability to interact with most buttons. Even if they are not 100% complete, maybe they will be in future updates? However, essential features such as air traffic control, ATC ambience in the FMC/MCDU, or even flight crew with announcements are missing. Ground services such as jetways, ground crew, refueling and automatic pushback are also absent. Additionally, modern aircraft like the A350, A330neo, A320/21Neo, A220 and ATR42/72 600, with modern airline liveries and cargo updates or variants, are missing, as well as cabin views or window views like in RFS or FS2020. I wonder if future updates will address these concerns, or if we'll have to wait for the next evolution of Aerofly on iOS next year. The game has potential, but will these updates come soon, even if they are paid for?
We are constantly working on new airports, new aircraft and new features behind the scenes and our plan is to keep updating Aerofly FS Global.
-
How would you control rudder and ailerons at the same time then? This only works for airliners but what about helicopters and gliders where rudder or tail rotor are essentially?
I don't have two thumbs on one hand, do you?
-
The repaint is not made for Aerofly FS and is incompatible.
-
We've been busy behind the scenes and we'll have more news soon.
-
To reset the view you can double click with the mouse.
Our goal is to provide a good selection of easily accessible views out of the box. This system needs to work with VR hand controllers, gamepads, with a joystick, keyboard and with a mouse as well as being compatible with touch devices. And saving and reloading custom views would only work well with a keyboard or would require extensive menus for something that should not be required in the first place. Ideally all cameras that most people need are already set up for you. This is why my followup question always is: What cameras do you need which we don't yet have? You probably aren't the only one who may need this or that view, so perhaps we can add it in as a default view, so you don't need custom views! This way everyone would benefit not just a single person or a handful of people that make the effort of setting up custom views.
