Posts by John.9

Quote from WAR_Capybara

not really true

Even when accounting for atmospheric scattering and aerosols, the daytime sky is generally brighter and more saturated than in Aerofly, especially as perceived by the human eye.

The current rendering results in an atmosphere that appears too dark and desaturated.

Additionally, clouds only take on greenish hues under very specific conditions. In standard weather, they mainly reflect the blue component of the sky, with smoother transitions between white and blue.

A slight adjustment to luminance, saturation, and sky–cloud transitions would improve perceptual realism.

Quote from Kosmin_Maksym

That’s not possible because they not makes opening doors animation for b739

Make sure the beacon lights are turned off and that the doors can now be opened easily.

Currently, turbulence in Aerofly is set manually and remains constant throughout the entire flight once the intensity is increased. In reality, turbulence tends to occur in zones or sections, with calm phases in between.

An interesting improvement would be to introduce dynamic turbulence zones, for example:

• Sections with active turbulence,
• Periods of calm air during cruise,
• Natural variations in intensity depending on the area being flown through.

This would make flights much more realistic and immersive, without requiring continuous turbulence from takeoff to landing.

Hello,

First of all, thank you for the excellent work done on Aerofly.

I would however like to share a suggestion regarding the atmosphere and sky rendering, in order to make the experience even more immersive.

Currently, at high altitude, the sky often appears uniformly dark blue, with a rather abrupt transition between the horizon and the upper atmosphere. Compared to real-life photos taken from a commercial airliner, we can observe that:

• The sky shows a more gradual gradient (lighter blue near the horizon, deeper blue overhead),
• The horizon is often slightly hazy or diffused due to atmospheric scattering,
• Colors vary depending on altitude, time of day, and weather conditions.

Possible improvements could include:

• A more realistic atmospheric gradient (with more pronounced Rayleigh/Mie scattering),
• A slight atmospheric haze near the horizon even in clear weather,
• Variations in sky tint depending on altitude and time of day (morning, noon, sunset),
• A smoother transition between the Earth and the sky at very high altitude.
  

These adjustments would make cruise flights even more immersive and closer to reality, especially during long-haul flights.

Thank you again for your work and for listening to the community.

Keep up the great work.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Just a random idea: if you disable traffic labels and paths does the HUD disappear as it should?

No, but when you zoom in, it disappears, and when you zoom out, it reappears.

Hello, I’m planning to buy an Acer Nitro V 15 laptop equipped with a Ryzen 5 7535HS, an RTX 4050 6 GB, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1080p 144 Hz display. Before finalizing my purchase, I’d like to know whether this configuration is capable of running Aerofly FS 4 smoothly with high graphics settings. Thank you very much for your advice and feedback!

Quote from Joao_Gabriel

Making the night darker will harm users who do not use aircraft lights for performance reasons.

So this could be an option in the game settings.

Can you make the night darker like afs2022? there is a big difference between afs2022 and afs global, the plane seems too white from the inside and outside, the clouds are too white too!

Aerofly fs global

Aerofly fs 2022

Quote from THOR_AVIATION

You like to speculate, but have you ever wondered if anyone likes your speculations?

But everyone is free to speculate on the forum, right?

Quote from AeroflyBro

Guys, do you play Aerofly for the liveries? Or maybe for the sake of realism and high-quality detail?

Liveries are part of realism

Quote from Kingair_Mechanic

Thanks but these aren’t gliding airports 😅

Sorry

Quote from patrick_silva

Hello Ipacs, I come here to ask a question. Yesterday I downloaded the aerofly Fs Global, but the sound of the A321 engines is the same as the A320.

there are two types of engines IAE and CFM, this changes depending on the livery you choose

B787-9

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Let the speculations begin!

A Mercedes?

Quote from Yousef

When i want to descend and i put my altitude it says in the tutorial that i have to press the altitude button to be in managed mode but on mobile when i press it nothing happens

what type of plane is this?

Quote from Yousef

But like i wanna use the mcdu to make a flight plan to make it more realistic is that possible?

Yes, here is a tutorial

A320 MCDU Programming | Aerofly FS

it's the same thing for discontinuity

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

When exactly do you see this issue. Both planes are around their max landing weight so if course the climb rate will be much higher than if they were fully loaded.

It's been about a week and a half since I had this problem and because of that I'm doing it manually.

Good evening, I wanted to report a problem on the b787 and the 777 they tend to pitch up at 4000 feet per minute and the same thing when they descend "on autopilot".

Would this problem be resolved?

Quote from j.h.aviation

I use Android

contact me