• I think they should share some roadmap as a "to be" changelog on what they are working for next updated and versions.

    At least that put everything on a path and people would see their requests addressed and on which order they are being done aswell.

    IPACS Support  admin

    Nope,what if that update/feature that people need wouldn't come until in a much later time,that will just cause more frustration and complains

  • We are constantly working on new features and do experiments to test out new ideas. This doesn't mean they end up in the public release. If we announce everything then history has shown us that users get upset about a feature being delayed or not coming at all. That's why we do not publish a roadmap, it just increases our workload and the amount of support work and it slows down actual development. Instead we announce new features when they are almost finished and we are getting close to the public release. You can find these announcements in our blog

    Aerofly FS News

    Regards,

    Jan

  • We are constantly working on new features and do experiments to test out new ideas. This doesn't mean they end up in the public release. If we announce everything then history has shown us that users get upset about a feature being delayed or not coming at all. That's why we do not publish a roadmap, it just increases our workload and the amount of support work and it slows down actual development. Instead we announce new features when they are almost finished and we are getting close to the public release. You can find these announcements in our blog

    Aerofly FS News

    Will the system requirements be reduced on the iPhone in the next version? At least reduce it to the A11 chip, is it okay?

  • I remember back in the middle of last year, Jan mentioned in passing that the team were looking at doing a particular thing somewhere down the track. There was an immediate response from one of the professional complainers, with detailed destructive criticism of how IPACS were getting it wrong - even though the team had not even started on it.

    There is no reason why people outside IPACS should be allowed free access to commercially sensitive information.