1. Aerofly Homepage
  2. Forum
    1. Dashboard
    2. Unresolved Threads
  3. Blog
    1. Articles
  4. Dashboard
  5. Gallery
    1. Aerofly FS 4
    2. Aerofly FS Mobile
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Forum
  • Files
  • Pages
  • Gallery
  • Blog Articles
  • More Options
  1. IPACS Aerofly Forum
  2. Forum
  3. Aerofly FS 2 Flight Simulator ( PC Version / Mac OS )
  4. Developers - Scenery development

FSET oddity

  • Adam-80UK
  • July 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM
  • Adam-80UK
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    74
    Points
    1,759
    Posts
    270
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM
    • #1

    When I draw my square and it say "Required Work Space" in MB, the number varies on the same resolution when clicking up and down.

    What I mean is, at resolution zero it will be whatever MB, but if I click resolution up to 1 then back down to 0, having touched nothing else, it's not the same number as it originally was.

    Can anyone explain this? I want to be sure I am not being duped out of some res.

  • Adam-80UK
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    74
    Points
    1,759
    Posts
    270
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:03 AM
    • #2

    Just as an example, right now if I put res on -1 then move to 0, required space is 750696 MB. If I move res to 1 then back down to 0 it's 48432 MB.

  • Adam-80UK
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    74
    Points
    1,759
    Posts
    270
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:04 AM
    • #3

    I'm going out on a limb and guessing if there are no res 0 images, it uses the selection before or something to fill in?

  • Adam-80UK
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    74
    Points
    1,759
    Posts
    270
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM
    • #4

    Also changing zoom level reverts it to 193728 MB, what is going on here?!

  • Spit40
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    650
    Points
    7,260
    Posts
    1,226
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:25 AM
    • #5

    I've found the MB thing to be very flaky. My conclusion was that it doesn't stay in sync very well with the settings you choose.

    Phil

    VR Flying with HP Reverb, DOF Reality 3DOF Motion Platform, "007" G-Seat, 3D Printed flight control system, overclocked i7-6700k, 16GB, GTX1080ti. FS2 Wiki Bookmark

    FSCloudPort 2,000+ AFS2 worldwide airports available for immediate download

  • Adam-80UK
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    74
    Points
    1,759
    Posts
    270
    • July 18, 2017 at 12:32 AM
    • #6

    So basically ignore it and outcome will be same regardless?

  • frui
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    140
    Points
    2,150
    Posts
    366
    • July 18, 2017 at 1:06 AM
    • #7

    Ignore it. It's not accurate. You will roughly know the disk usage when you have done it several times.

  • Trespassers
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    590
    Points
    5,785
    Posts
    986
    • July 18, 2017 at 11:23 AM
    • #8

    It is an estimation of the necessary required workspace needed for resampling.

    I assume you're not using FSX/P3D's resampler in this case, then you should ignore it.

    Cheers

    Antoine

    Config : i7 6900K - 20MB currently set at 3.20GHz, Cooling Noctua NH-U14S, Motherboard ASUS Rampage V Extreme U3.1, RAM HyperX Savage Black Edition 16GB DDR4 3000 MHz, Graphic Card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 8GB, Power supply Corsair RM Series 850W, Windows 10 64 bit.

  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Legal Notice
Powered by WoltLab Suite™ 6.1.8