Since the bug tracker was deleted by the system in the section of the forum dedicated to the Beta version of aerofly, I have just a few bugs and minor touches to ask to be fixed. Images will be attached.
1) 787’s engine rating says GENC instead of GEnX as it did in previous installations.
2) runway numbers at São Paulo SBGR do not align between the navigation setup and the location selection menu. One reads 09/27 and the other says 10/28, the latter of which is actually written on the runways.
3) strange terrain data in Las Vegas and New York City? Both should be totally flat and have some weird changes in elevation in the middle of the city. I believe admin addressed this, so should be easily fixable.
4) buildings in front of RWY10 at SXM make it hard to land a 747 there (as KLM did for many years) without the wing hitting an apartment or house (images will be attached)
5) the Concorde’s N2 reading should be naturally higher, I’m at Mach 2.038 at 60,000ft and according to a YouTube stream with the Colimata Concorde for XPlane 11, it should be cruising at about 94-95% N2. The case being that anything below that, while the aircraft is suspersonic, would cause the engines to surge and flame out. Aerofly’s one seems to do round 85% N2 at cruise, which is fine, but doesn’t seem normal.
6) the same case with the fuel flow figure per engine gauges. I’d expect it burns way more than 6 tonnes per hour per engine in a supercruise? (Colimata one was showing 2x-3x this figure)
7) this dial/knob thing on said fuel flow gauges which allows the pilot to change the tiny value in the top of the instrument? It normally reads 021 but can be wound all the way up or all the way down. What’s it for? (Image attached)
