I would like to see paintings of Brazilian airlines on the A320.
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
I would like to see paintings of Brazilian airlines on the A320.
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
They one is true, BUT: Sun Country operated -700s without winglets.
Are the -500 and -700 not different? The -700 is longer and has different performance specs (MTOW, range, etc.)
The fact that Aerofly's 737-500 has four "fake" liveries should allow the 737-900/MAX 9 to have three "fake" liveries.
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
I don't see any problem with that, after all this topic talks about paintings. If no restrictions were established by the moderators, then everything is fine.
We're working on adding a lot of new liveries of different aircraft but I don't know which liveries are currently being worked on and for which aircraft. So more liveries are coming, I don't know which ones.
can we have scoot 787-10 and A320 for SEA?[Blocked Image: https://static.ffx.io/images/%24zoom_1%2C%24multiply_0.477%2C%24ratio_1.777778%2C%24width_1677%2C%24x_216%2C%24y_196/t_crop_custom/q_86%2Cf_auto/2f626faecd577b43f5739f2354d00f62aac110ad]
Are the -500 and -700 not different? The -700 is longer and has different performance specs (MTOW, range, etc.)
And an entirely differing cockpit but they look similar when a -800 and -900 look quite different due to fuselage length
It would be better if ipacs added a website where players could make paintings and we could download and implement them in the game.
Anyone who creates liveries of aircraft can publish them here:
What do you both think, Jet-Pack (IPACS) and admin?
There’s already 6 liveries in Aerofly that were never flown in real-life (4 of which are on the 737-500), so surely it wouldn’t hurt to add 3 more on the 737-900/MAX 9, perhaps temporarily until the 737-800/MAX 8 comes out? (If/when that happens).
You may get a few complaints or jokes, but if you want, a good solution would be noting in the Aerofly livery selector that they aren’t real-life liveries. It doesn’t hurt anyone as they don’t have to fly those liveries, but adding the liveries would massively benefit users.
Please consider this.
What do you both think, Jet-Pack (IPACS) and admin?
There’s already 6 liveries in Aerofly that were never flown in real-life (4 of which are on the 737-500), so surely it wouldn’t hurt to add 3 more on the 737-900/MAX 9, perhaps temporarily until the 737-800/MAX 8 comes out? (If/when that happens).
You may get a few complaints or jokes, but if you want, a good solution would be noting in the Aerofly livery selector that they aren’t real-life liveries. It doesn’t hurt anyone as they don’t have to fly those liveries, but adding the liveries would massively benefit users.
Please consider this.
At this rate I think this may become a war
We're working on adding a lot of new liveries of different aircraft but I don't know which liveries are currently being worked on and for which aircraft. So more liveries are coming, I don't know which ones.
I would love the Brussels Airlines livery for the A320
I would love the Brussels Airlines livery for the A320
Keep to the channel of what we want not A320
And an entirely differing cockpit but they look similar when a -800 and -900 look quite different due to fuselage length
Would it be easier to convert it back into the 737-200 that the -500 sim model was modified from, would restoring the original thin engine nacelles be easier than generating a longer fuselage for a -300/400?
The wing was new for the Next Generation -600, -700, -800 and 900s, quite different from earlier 737s.
The current (not really correct for most -500s) all analog instruments are worth keeping in authentic form in a 737-200, I loved their ‘reveal everything’ thrust reversers. The taper on the last metre of jet pipe was clearly visible🤓 It provided the nozzle’s thrust with reduced jet pipe friction loses🥰
The more modest -200’s JT8D engine thrust would also be interesting. Some lovely retro 70s to 90s liveries would be possible.
(P.S. can we let threads evolve naturally please)
Yes I agree the original thin engines would look much better on the B737 Retro. I know the aircraft from the 70s just like the B727, back then as PanAm.
At this rate I think this may become a war
😂
They one is true, BUT: Sun Country operated -700s without winglets.
The 735 is shorter than the -700, more like the -600. Hence it won’t be a replacement.
Would it be easier to convert it back into the 737-200 that the -500 sim model was modified from, would restoring the original thin engine nacelles be easier than generating a longer fuselage for a -300/400?
The wing was new for the Next Generation -600, -700, -800 and 900s, quite different from earlier 737s.The current (not really correct for most -500s) all analog instruments are worth keeping in authentic form in a 737-200, I loved their ‘reveal everything’ thrust reversers. The taper on the last metre of jet pipe was clearly visible🤓 It provided the nozzle’s thrust with reduced jet pipe friction loses🥰
The more modest -200’s JT8D engine thrust would also be interesting. Some lovely retro 70s to 90s liveries would be possible.
(P.S. can we let threads evolve naturally please)
Yeah: I wasn't really in depth as I was quickly writing a short-handed response.