I would like to see paintings of Brazilian airlines on the A320.
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
I don't see any problem with that, after all this topic talks about paintings. If no restrictions were established by the moderators, then everything is fine.
We're working on adding a lot of new liveries of different aircraft but I don't know which liveries are currently being worked on and for which aircraft. So more liveries are coming, I don't know which ones.
There’s already 6 liveries in Aerofly that were never flown in real-life (4 of which are on the 737-500), so surely it wouldn’t hurt to add 3 more on the 737-900/MAX 9, perhaps temporarily until the 737-800/MAX 8 comes out? (If/when that happens).
You may get a few complaints or jokes, but if you want, a good solution would be noting in the Aerofly livery selector that they aren’t real-life liveries. It doesn’t hurt anyone as they don’t have to fly those liveries, but adding the liveries would massively benefit users.
There’s already 6 liveries in Aerofly that were never flown in real-life (4 of which are on the 737-500), so surely it wouldn’t hurt to add 3 more on the 737-900/MAX 9, perhaps temporarily until the 737-800/MAX 8 comes out? (If/when that happens).
You may get a few complaints or jokes, but if you want, a good solution would be noting in the Aerofly livery selector that they aren’t real-life liveries. It doesn’t hurt anyone as they don’t have to fly those liveries, but adding the liveries would massively benefit users.
We're working on adding a lot of new liveries of different aircraft but I don't know which liveries are currently being worked on and for which aircraft. So more liveries are coming, I don't know which ones.
I would love the Brussels Airlines livery for the A320
And an entirely differing cockpit but they look similar when a -800 and -900 look quite different due to fuselage length
Would it be easier to convert it back into the 737-200 that the -500 sim model was modified from, would restoring the original thin engine nacelles be easier than generating a longer fuselage for a -300/400?
The wing was new for the Next Generation -600, -700, -800 and 900s, quite different from earlier 737s.
The current (not really correct for most -500s) all analog instruments are worth keeping in authentic form in a 737-200, I loved their ‘reveal everything’ thrust reversers. The taper on the last metre of jet pipe was clearly visible🤓 It provided the nozzle’s thrust with reduced jet pipe friction loses🥰
The more modest -200’s JT8D engine thrust would also be interesting. Some lovely retro 70s to 90s liveries would be possible.
Yes I agree the original thin engines would look much better on the B737 Retro. I know the aircraft from the 70s just like the B727, back then as PanAm.
Would it be easier to convert it back into the 737-200 that the -500 sim model was modified from, would restoring the original thin engine nacelles be easier than generating a longer fuselage for a -300/400?
The wing was new for the Next Generation -600, -700, -800 and 900s, quite different from earlier 737s.
The current (not really correct for most -500s) all analog instruments are worth keeping in authentic form in a 737-200, I loved their ‘reveal everything’ thrust reversers. The taper on the last metre of jet pipe was clearly visible🤓 It provided the nozzle’s thrust with reduced jet pipe friction loses🥰
The more modest -200’s JT8D engine thrust would also be interesting. Some lovely retro 70s to 90s liveries would be possible.
(P.S. can we let threads evolve naturally please)
Yeah: I wasn't really in depth as I was quickly writing a short-handed response.
