I don't think it's that easy to convert an airliner from an RC game into a realistic flight simulation.
But we’ll see what Ipacs will “gift” us in the near future:)
I don't think it's that easy to convert an airliner from an RC game into a realistic flight simulation.
But we’ll see what Ipacs will “gift” us in the near future:)
HOPING for An Airbus 
HOPING for An Airbus
An A330-300 would certainly be nice!
If you don't need a cockpit and can live with the lack of detail then the model could be converted. But if you want cockpit views or wing views then we're talking about making a new aircraft from scratch.
I think we should let Ipacs focus on upcoming aircraft (333) only so we dont get delays in that
I think we should let Ipacs focus on upcoming aircraft (333) only so we dont get delays in that
I'd be fine with an A350-900 (NOT 1000- we have too many stretched variants and none have been converted into "regular" versions yet) if it had KLM/Delta/Air France/Swiss liveries (some are future operators).
Also, since we have been told that the reason for selecting large variants is to shrink them eventually, I'm hoping to eventually see the A319 (or A321 which has different flaps), B777-200LR, B787-8/9, B737-700, B737 MAX 8, CRJ700, etc.
I'd be fine with an A350-900 (NOT 1000- we have too many stretched variants and none have been converted into "regular" versions yet) if it had KLM/Delta/Air France/Swiss liveries (some are future operators).
Also, since we have been told that the reason for selecting large variants is to shrink them eventually, I'm hoping to eventually see the A319 (or A321 which has different flaps), B777-200LR, B787-8/9, B737-700, B737 MAX 8, CRJ700, etc.
I would like to see A320 neo and 333 or 359. This sim really needs a medium-long haul airliner
How about going a bit earler? Instead of a Douglas DC10/MD11(same thing
) go with an Aerofly Douglas DC 6/7
featuring supercharged piston engines and constant speed propellers and with simulated working high boost and peaking exhaust gas temperature mixture control and fuel burn and pressurisation.
Real FS4 navigation with the 1960s navigation aids would be more entertaining and rewarding than pressing an LNAV button! Imagine working out just where you have arrived on seeing land or an alive ADF needle.
If you don't need a cockpit and can live with the lack of detail then the model could be converted. But if you want cockpit views or wing views then we're talking about making a new aircraft from scratch.
It would be cool, at least for prints and to play a little xD
I think we should let Ipacs focus on upcoming aircraft (333) only so we dont get delays in that
Is it even officially stated?
Is it even officially stated?
I don't think...
Is it even officially stated?
All we can do is hope...
Cuz they try to keep future developments private
All we can do is hope...
Cuz they try to keep future developments private
I forgot about the Max incident almost every week a very certain someone kept on making threads on when the max was comming
I forgot about the Max incident almost every week a very certain someone kept on making threads on when the max was comming
A330 is far more popular than max ( in my opinion)
A330 is far more popular than max ( in my opinion)
The 737 Max has only become so well known through the accidents
The 737 Max has only become so well known through the accidents
Boeing should give up on max and try improving NG and 78X cuz max has too many problems each of them line up like traffic on Heathrow. max will cost them tooo much
How about going a bit earler? Instead of a Douglas DC10/MD11(same thing
Real FS4 navigation with the 1960s navigation aids would be more entertaining and rewarding than pressing an LNAV button! Imagine working out just where you have arrived on seeing land or an alive ADF needle.
A DC-3 would also be a good asset 
A DC-3 would also be a good asset
And a Ford Trimotor. It would be a nice collection along with the Ju-52.
