I was really pleased to know that the A321 will soon arrive at Aerofly FS Global but it would also be great to add Garmin GPS to the Baron 58 and Cessna 172 as these planes only fly via VOR and NDB.
And there was a moving map in the C172 in FS2 (also scroll the screenshots), as far as I remember. It used the regular map data, without any additional interactivity.
IPACS should focus on implementing GPS on the Baron and Cessna instead of bringing in two more gliders. Almost no one flies gliders and I think it's a waste of time.
Personally, I don't like gliders. I don't know about other people, but I hate this type of aircraft because it is very bad to fly in flight simulators. As I mentioned in the previous comment, I consider it a waste of time to bring more gliders to Aerofly FS. The focus should be on features highly requested by the community such as multiplayer, ATC, fuel consumption, weight and balance, rain, among others.
And there was a moving map in the C172 in FS2 (also scroll the screenshots), as far as I remember. It used the regular map data, without any additional interactivity.
I was unable to identify the existence of GPS on these Aerofly FS2 planes that appear in the video. Are you sure these planes had GPS?
Personally, I don't like gliders. I don't know about other people, but I hate this type of aircraft because it is very bad to fly in flight simulators. As I mentioned in the previous comment, I consider it a waste of time to bring more gliders to Aerofly FS. The focus should be on features highly requested by the community such as multiplayer, ATC, fuel consumption, weight and balance, rain, among others.
I’m not complaining about the a321 but I gotta agree with you on that, gliders are not it we need what the community asked for😀
I’m not complaining about the a321 but I gotta agree with you on that, gliders are not it we need what the community asked for😀
Motorized aircraft are always welcome. I thought it was super cool to know that the team is working on the A321. Now as for gliders, it's a pure waste of time. There is no need to bring two gliders right away as almost no one likes this type of aircraft. The time spent developing these two gliders could be invested in implementing GPS on the Baron and Cessna 172 in addition to other much more important features that I mentioned in previous comments.
Managing drag and uplift is a lovely chance to experience the reward of some decent brain effort.
Have you gone up and down the Rhine below Lake Constance using an east-west wind across the valley? Ridge lift makes the best of the beautiful alpine scenery.
Now as for gliders, it's a pure waste of time. There is no need to bring two gliders right away as almost no one likes this type of aircraft.
If possible, always speak for yourself. I, for one, am happier with these two gliders than another airliner to add to the existing 11. Of course I didn't include the Ju 52.
If possible, always speak for yourself. I, for one, am happier with these two gliders than another airliner to add to the existing 11. Of course I didn't include the Ju 52.
To be fair he didn’t say no one, he said “almost no one” which is true not a lot of the community like gliders, I feel like the energy they put in the two gliders should be channeled towards something the community wants.
I was unable to identify the existence of GPS on these Aerofly FS2 planes that appear in the video. Are you sure these planes had GPS?
I meant the screenshots, not the videos. And I am pretty sure it was a GPS in the Duchess (screenshot 4) and Bonanza, as well as a moving map in the C172 (picture 8), because these were the planes I have been flying back than.
To be fair he didn’t say no one, he said “almost no one” which is true not a lot of the community like gliders, I feel like the energy they put in the two gliders should be channeled towards something the community wants.
You're absolutely right, but what if a small part of the community will fall in love with the gliders once they're here in front of their eyes? By the way, believe me that Neil Armstrong didn't start flying on the X 15 either.
I meant the screenshots, not the videos. And I am pretty sure it was a GPS in the Duchess (screenshot 4) and Bonanza, as well as a moving map in the C172 (picture 8), because these were the planes I have been flying back than.
I've never seen GPS on Aerofly's general aviation planes.
IPACS should focus on implementing GPS on the Baron and Cessna instead of bringing in two more gliders. Almost no one flies gliders and I think it's a waste of time.
Personally, I don't like gliders. I don't know about other people, but I hate this type of aircraft because it is very bad to fly in flight simulators. As I mentioned in the previous comment, I consider it a waste of time to bring more gliders to Aerofly FS. The focus should be on features highly requested by the community such as multiplayer, ATC, fuel consumption, weight and balance, rain, among others.
I was unable to identify the existence of GPS on these Aerofly FS2 planes that appear in the video. Are you sure these planes had GPS?
I like gliders in fact and some of my Soaring friends are hyped up for it
The FS2 PA 28R Piper Arrow III/IV’s GPS was/ IS left buggy. Fixing it properly might have been up to Just Flight (have they ever done such a thing?) but it remained fixated on the start of the first leg of a route which spoiled much of its benefit. Minor faults like mixing up true and magnetic bearings were fixed following those forum reports but not the permanent current track line indicating back to the start of the route. It frequently got itself all muddled during a route and usually reverted to that unwanted false waypoint.
It was good but it ought to have been better, after all the Arrow was payware. Being inside FS2 that GPS is probably incompatible but it would not be satisfactory for FS4 or mobile the way it is.
And I am pretty sure it was a GPS in the Duchess (screenshot 4) and Bonanza, as well as a moving map in the C172 (picture 8), because these were the planes I have been flying back than.
